Video

HFA 2026: Subcutaneous Furosemide for Early HF Discharge — SUBCUT-HF II

Published: 23 May 2026

  • Views:

    Views Icon 46
  • Likes:

    Heart Icon 0
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating
View Transcript

HFA Congress 2026 — SUBCUT-HF II: subcutaneous furosemide for early supported discharge in worsening heart failure. Dr Ross Campbell (University of Glasgow, UK) shares results from SUBCUT-HF II, a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial evaluating subcutaneous furosemide in patients hospitalised with worsening heart failure.

A total of 172 patients across 22 UK centres were randomised to standard inpatient care with intravenous furosemide or an early supported discharge strategy using SQIN-Furosemide, a pH-neutral subcutaneous formulation with bioavailability comparable to intravenous therapy, delivered via a patient-administered patch pump. Over 90% of patients applied the device themselves.

The primary endpoint, days alive and out of hospital at 30 days, was higher in the early discharge group. Length of index hospitalisation was reduced. Heart failure rehospitalisations were numerically higher, while quality of life (KCCQ) was similar between groups. At 60 days, the difference in days alive and out of hospital was maintained.

Rates of serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest were similar between groups. Device-related adverse events were infrequent, with no serious events reported across more than 1,000 applications.


Interview Questions:
1. What clinical and health system burdens are driving the need for early supported discharge strategies in heart failure and how does subcutaneous furosemide address an unmet need?
2. With regards to trial design, how were patients selected, what did the intervention involve and how was the SQIN-Infusor used in a home setting?
3. What were your primary endpoint findings?
4. What did the secondary outcomes show in terms of rehospitalisation, cardiovascular mortality, and quality of life at 60 days?
5. How did the safety profile compare between arms?
6. What would need to happen for subcutaneous furosemide to become a routine part of heart failure management, and what are the next steps for this technology?

Recorded on-site at Heart Failure Association Congress 2026, Barcelona.
Editors: Jordan Rance, Mirjam Boros
Videographer: Tom Green, David Ben-Harosh

Support: This is an independent interview produced by Radcliffe Cardiology.

Transcript

My name is Ross Campbell. I’m a cardiologist and senior clinical lecturer at the University of Glasgow and the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow.

Many patients are admitted to hospital with worsening heart failure and require treatment with intravenous diuretics. These patients are admitted very frequently, and their hospital stays are often long. Patients would often prefer to be managed outside of a hospital bed, ideally in their own home. The challenge is delivering parenteral diuretics in that environment.

This is where this innovation comes in. We can deliver subcutaneous furosemide to patients and enable them to administer their own treatment.

This was a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing standard care—where patients were managed in hospital with intravenous diuretics—to an early supported discharge strategy using a novel mini-pump and subcutaneous furosemide.

We included patients who were primarily admitted with worsening heart failure and who had an ongoing requirement for intravenous diuretics.

The mini-pump device has been designed for patients to assemble and administer themselves after appropriate training. Patients applied the pump to their own abdomen in over 90% of cases.

The primary outcome was the number of days spent alive and out of hospital. This is an important measure because it captures not only the length of the initial hospital stay but also any readmissions or deaths during the follow-up period.

The key finding was that, with an early supported discharge strategy, patients spent more days alive and out of hospital.

We also assessed several secondary endpoints. We observed a reduction in the length of the index hospitalisation. There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. There was a numerically higher number of heart failure rehospitalisations; however, at 60-day follow-up, the benefit in days alive and out of hospital was maintained.

The safety profile was very favourable. There were adverse events in both treatment arms, as expected in a multimorbid elderly population admitted with heart failure. However, there was no difference in serious adverse events between the two strategies, and no difference in adverse events of special interest.

We also evaluated the safety of the device itself. There were over 1,000 applications of the device, with more than 90% applied by patients themselves. Despite this, device-related adverse events were extremely rare, and there were no serious adverse events related to device use.

Overall, our trial demonstrates that this patient-led approach, using subcutaneous furosemide delivered via a mini-pump, offers a favourable safety profile and represents a viable, more comfortable alternative to conventional inpatient care for patients with worsening heart failure.

There are, of course, regulatory processes required for the drug to become a licensed medicinal product in Europe. While the formulation already has FDA approval in the United States, further regulatory steps are needed in Europe. The device itself has received CE marking.

Comments

You must be to comment. If you are not registered, you can register here.